apollobanner





moon hoax

July 20th, 2009, marked the 40th anniversary of NASA's great achievement of allegedly landing the first man on the Moon. I have been investigating the Apollo hoax argument for the past 10 years and in that time I have come across some incredible evidence that I wish to share with you here. And with me finishing this updated article just days after the official 40th anniversary, there has never been a better time to bring forward new information that many of you would never have heard of before.

Because of the vastness of the subject, I will be uploading this article in several parts. Part I delves into the 'space race' and the propaganda which was used between the US and the Soviets during the Cold War. It also details the faults behind the Apollo I fire and the incompetence and neglegance of NASA at that time. Part II will be coming soon and will tackle the question of radiation, communications and the problems that the astronauts would have encountered as they went to the Moon.

My Apollo Hoax article has been on the internet, in one form or another, since 1999 and has generated many debates over the years. My original article is one of the most copied and redistributed Apollo hoax theories that appears on the internet today. You may have even come across parts of it before on other UFO web sites who unfortunately don't have the common courtesy to acknowledge where the information originally came from.

Obviously, with such a viewpoint, I have been involved in many heated debates relating to Apollo over the years, both for and against my arguments. I have learned a lot in that time, and as a researcher, can hold my hand up and admit that some of my original theories were incorrect. However, with a little more investigation, an ear that was willing to listen and the wish to provide the most honest and level-headed evidence that is currently available, I can now bring new theories to the table that have not been investigated before. In fact, and as you will see later in a future chapter of this article - I can shoot down the whole Apollo project with just one single official NASA photograph!

But before you get started, let me tell you about the new stuff. I will be including a new section that delves into the hoax theories of other Apollo investigators that tend to be misleading. The reasons for this is because I am getting tired of sceptics accusing me of believing and supporting the many weird and wacky theories that plague the internet. I don't support the 'flags blowing in the wind' type of theory and I will go into details showing you why most of those accusations should be ignored.

More evidence has come to light recently which strengthens my argument that NASA have covered up or altered the real history behind the Apollo project. You would think that maybe after a decade of research into the Apollo Moon landings, there would be nothing more to investigate? However, to this day, evidence is still coming to light that keeps me intrigued and looking for that definitive answer. Even the new, clearer Apollo footage that has just been released by NASA in the build up to the 40th Anniversary, has already got me asking questions.

People say to me 'NASA could not engineer a hoax if you compare the film technology to films such as 2001: A Space Odyssey' (which was released a year before the Apollo 11 landing.) But what they fail to recognise is that NASA had access to 4% of the federal budget! Stanley Kubrick's film cost a mere $10.5 million dollars, which is just about 4% of the budget of the Apollo 11 mission alone (the Apollo 11 mission is estimated to have cost $355 million - that's an equivalent of $1.75 billion in today's figures.) According to Steve Garber, the NASA History website curator, the final cost of project Apollo was between $20 and $25.4 billion in 1969 dollars (or approximately $135 billion in 2005 dollars). I personally believe that NASA's main goal was to fool the Soviet Union into thinking they were more technologically advanced in the space race and better equipped to produce military hardware during the Cold War. Remember that NASA are first and foremost a military establishment.

Sit back, pour yourself a drink and have a good read of what I am about to reveal. Here you will discover how NASA miraculously managed to get their program back on track and totally rebuild their craft, just 2 and a half years after the Apollo I tragedy. I will also show you how NASA manipulates photographs and other data that which will prove that you have not heard the whole story. I hope that this article takes you on a new journey of discovery and maybe make you question things in the future. Nothing should be taken for granted and sometimes when you start digging, it's very hard to stop!

 

All the best,

    Author Dave Cosnette
 


Dave Cosnette
Dave@cosmic-conspiracies.com

part one
The Space Race – A Brief History


President John F. KennedyThe Apollo program was a project undertaken by NASA during the years 1961–1975 with the goal of conducting manned moon landing missions. The first lunar landing achieved the goal set out by American President John F. Kennedy on May 25th, 1961. Kennedy announced before a special joint session of Congress the dramatic and ambitious goal of sending an American safely to the Moon before the end of the decade.

A number of political factors affected Kennedy's decision and the timing of it. In general, Kennedy felt great pressure to have the United States "catch up to, and overtake" the Soviet Union in the "space race." Kennedy's 'landing Man on the Moon' speech was made just 6 weeks after the Soviets had launched Yuri Gagarin into orbit and just 20 days after America had sent Alan Shepard, their first man in space, on a sub-orbital flight over the Atlantic. I will be posting a video clip in a later chapter, showing what Christopher Kraft (former director of Johnson Space Center) had to say of this event during the recent 40th Anniversary Apollo celebrations.


Up until the first Apollo landing, the Soviet Union had led the way in space exploration. The Space Race had been initiated more than 10 years earlier as the Soviet Union launched the Sputnik I, Earth’s first artificial satellite, into space on October 4th, 1957. The unanticipated announcement shocked America and there was the USA tried with great determination to stop the Soviets from gaining the upper hand, especially as both Countries were in a state of conflict because of the Cold War, which had been raging since the 1940’s (and didn’t end until the early 90’s.)

Sputnik helped to identify the upper atmospheric layer's density by measuring the satellite's orbital changes and provided data on radio-signal distribution in the ionosphere. Pressurized nitrogen, in the satellite's body, provided the first opportunity for meteoroid detection. If a meteoroid penetrated the satellite's outer hull, it would be detected by the temperature data sent back to Earth. The satellite took just over 96 minutes to make a complete orbit of Earth, as it travelled at 18,000 mph (29,000 kph). Radio signals emitted by Sputnik were picked up by amateur radio listeners on 20.005 and 40.002 MHz. The signals continued for 22 days until the transmitters batteries ran out. Sputnik I burnt up as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere, after travelling approximately 37 million miles (60 million km) and spending 3 months in orbit.

At the very beginning of 1959, the Russians announced their intention of sending a spacecraft past the Moon. On January 2nd 1959, Moscow radio announced the launch of Luna I. It was the first man-made vehicle to free itself from Earth's gravity and travel into deep space. It is still in space today, revolving around the Sun once every 450 days.

Yuri Gagarin - wasn't the Soviet Unions first man in space!Four years after the Sputnik shock of 1957, the Soviet Union announced that the cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin had become the first human in space on April 12th, 1961, which greatly embarrassed the U.S. (although, Russia recently admitted that Gagarin wasn't actually the first man in space - you can read more about this event later in the article.)

Throughout this period, rivalry between the two superpowers was expressed through propaganda, military coalitions, espionage, and weapons development. It didn't take long for the Soviets to complete a string of subsequent rapid-fire space achievements including the R-7 rocket launch in 1959 that was the first to escape Earth’s gravity into a solar orbit. They also made the first crash impact onto the surface of the Moon and the first photography of the never-before-seen far side of the Moon. These missions used the Luna 1, Luna 2 and Luna 3 spacecraft, respectively.
It was obvious to both sides that whoever reached the Moon first would win the space race. Soviet and U.S. leaders knew that being the first country to land on the moon would create a worldwide media event. The world watched each country’s progress with great interest. Scientists and government leaders in both countries were under intense pressure to meet tough deadlines.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

spacerace
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Of course, the first part of any investigation is to look back into the history books to see how technically advanced both sides were for sending man to the Moon. Here is a historical timeline of the achievements made during the 'space race'. As you can see, the Soviets completely ruled the race up until the Apollo 11 landing - in fact, the Soviets achieved no less than 33 out of 38 'space firsts' in this list!

ussr

1957

Sputnik I


ussr - 'Sputnik I' becomes Earth's first artificial satellite. ‘Sputnik’ is the Russian word for ‘Traveler.’
ussr - First intercontinental ballistic missile, the R-7 Semyorka
ussr - First animal to enter Earth orbit, the dog Laika on Sputnik 2

1958

Explorer I

usaflag - The United States launches its first satellite, Explorer I. The satellite was crammed with equipment and included a Geiger counter that detected the existence of the Van Allen radiation belts, the most important discovery of the Space Age. That same year, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is formed in the United States. NASA is the federal agency devoted to exploring space.

1959


Luna II

ussr
- First firing of a rocket in Earth orbit, first man-made object to escape Earth's orbit, Luna 1
ussr - First data communications, or telemetry, to and from outer space, Luna 1.
ussr - First man-made object to pass near the Moon, first man-made object in Solar orbit, Luna 1
ussr - The Soviet Union launches Luna 2 - the first space probe to hit the moon.
ussr
- First images of the moon's far side, Luna 3

1960

Russian dogs Strelka and Belka went into space aboard Sputnik 5 and returned alive


ussr - First animals to safely return from Earth orbit on Sputnik 5.
ussr - First probe launched to Mars, Marsnik 1

1961
Yuri Gagarin - alleged first man in space

ussr - April 12th, 1961, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin becomes the first person in space and to orbit the Earth. (see below)
ussr - First probe launched to Venus, Venera 1
ussr - First person to spend over a day in space Gherman Titov, Vostok 2


usaflag - Alan Shepard, Jr. becomes the first American astronaut in space aboard the Freedom 7 (and was later the commander on Apollo 14). When reporters asked Shepard what he thought about as he sat atop the Redstone rocket, waiting for liftoff, he had replied, 'The fact that every part of this ship was built by the low bidder.'

1962
John Glenn - first American to orbit Earth


ussr
- First dual manned spaceflight and approach, Vostok 3 and Vostok 4

usaflag - John Glenn, Jr. becomes the first American astronaut to orbit the Earth. during NASA's Mercury program. He orbited the Earth aboard Friendship 7. Glenn also became the oldest person to fly in space when he flew aboard the Space Shuttle Discovery (STS-95) in 1998 at the age of 77.
1963
Valentina Tereshkova - first woman in space

 

ussr - Cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova became to first woman in space aboard the Vostok 6. She orbited the earth 48 times and spent almost three days in space, which was more than the combined flight times of all American astronauts at the time.

1964
Vladamir Komarov - aboard the Voskhod 1



ussr - The launch of 3 men aboard the Voskhod I is the first space flight to carry more than one person into space. Also the first flight without space suits.

1965
Aleksei Leonov - first space walk


ussr
- First space walk by Aleksei Leonov, Voskhod 2
ussr - First probe to hit another planet (Venus), Venera 3
1966
Luna 9 - First probe to take pictures from the Moons surface

 

ussr - First probe to make a soft landing on and transmit and take pictures from the moon's surface. (Luna 9)
ussr - First probe in lunar orbit, Luna 10

1967  

ussr - First unmanned rendezvous and docking, Cosmos 186/Cosmos 188. (Until 2006, this had remained the only major space achievement that the US had not duplicated.)

1968
Apollo 8 crew - Borman, Lovell and Anders

 

usaflag - The United States launches Apollo 8, the first manned space mission to orbit the moon.

1969
Apollo 11 crew - Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin

ussr - First docking between two manned craft in Earth orbit and exchange of crews, Soyuz 4 and Soyuz 5

usaflag
- U.S. astronauts Neil Armstrong, Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin and Michael Collins make it to the moon. Armstrong is the first man to walk on the moon and was followed by Buzz Aldrin.
1970
Lunokhod 1  - the first robotic space rover

ussr
- First samples automatically returned to Earth from another body, Luna 16
ussr - First robotic space rover, Lunokhod 1
ussr - First data received from the surface of another planet (Venus), Venera 7
1971
Salyut 1 - the first space station


ussr
- First space station, Salyut 1

ussr - First probe to orbit another planet (Mars), first probe to reach surface of Mars, Mars 2
1975   ussr - First probe to orbit Venus, first photos from surface of Venus, Venera 9
1984   ussr - First woman to walk in space, Svetlana Savitskaya (Salyut 7 space station)
1986  

ussr - First crew to visit two separate space stations (Mir and Salyut 7)
ussr - First permanently manned space station, Mir, which orbited the Earth from 1986 until 2001

1987   ussr - First crew to spend over one year in space, Vladimir Titov and Musa Manarov on board of TM-4 - Mir
     
Unfortunately, with every success comes disaster. Here is a brief outline of Soviet and American space related failures during the 'Space Race'...


It is difficult to give exact figures and dates for the Soviet Union's space disasters because during that time the Soviets were very secretive and kept many of these incidents away from the prying eyes of the Western World. Even today there are many contradictions regarding the circumstances in which these events took place.

Gagarin Was Not The First Man In Space

Yuri Gagarin was not the first man in space
Yuri Gagarin was not the
first man to travel into Space

Contrary to popular belief, Yuri Gagarin was not the first man to travel into space!

Alexis Ledovski accomplished that goal in 1957 when the Soviets launched a satellite carrying Ledovski from the Soviet missile centre 60 miles south-east of Stalingrad. However, all contact was lost with Ledovski when he was 200 miles up and it is thought that his space craft either disintegrated or carried on travelling into space. It was not until 4 years later, in 1961, that the Soviet Union declared Yuri Gagarin as the first man to travel into space. However, controversy still rages on today over whether this was a propaganda stunt as Gagarin's flight was not revealed until the Vostok I was actually in flight. The lift off wasn't filmed either and Gagarin arrived back on Earth by parachute.

During my research, one of the common questions that I am asked is 'how could NASA fool so many people if Soviet eyes and the rest of the World were watching the Apollo landings?' The same question could be asked of America's vigilance during and after Gagarin's flight. It was not even suspected that Gagarin was not the first man in space until Pravda, the Russian news agency, revealed the truth in 2001.

Why didn't NASA know of this until they were told? There is not one single picture of Gagarin in space and yet NASA believed the Soviets without question.

In fact, there are several clues that point towards Gagarin not even going into space. The pictures to the right show Gagarin's capsule as it landed back on Earth. However, if you look closely you will see that one picture shows the capsule lying in a grassy field, while the other rests on snow. Both pictures were allegedly taken at the time that the capsule landed.

Gagarins capsuleThere are glaring errors in the radio conversations that Gagarin allegedly made while he was aboard the Vostok I. It is thought that a tape recorder may have been placed in the craft. During the flight, Gagarin does not make any reference to the areas he is flying over whatsoever - other than claiming that he was over America, when in fact, he was over the Pacific near Chile at the time. Gagarin would just repeat that the flight was running as normal - no reference to which part of Earth was in light or dark, or of any landmarks.

Gagarin himself would unfortunately become a casualty of flight just a few years later.

He became deputy training director of the Star City cosmonaut training base. At the same time, he began to re-qualify as a fighter pilot. On 27th of March 1968, while on a routine training flight from Chkalovsky Air Base, he and flight instructor Vladimir Seryogin (Seregin) died in a MiG-15UTI crash near the town of Kirzhach. Gagarin and Seryogin were buried in the walls of the Kremlin on Red Square.

Other Soviet space disasters include Serenti Shiborin who was killed in 1958. A launch pad explosion killed cosmonaut Andrei Mitkov in 1959. Marshal Nedelin was killed in an explosion in September 1960, and it is believed that many of the top executives of the Russian program also died with him.

US intelligence is believed to have a list of 11 dead cosmonauts: 5 who failed in orbit, and 6 who died on the launch pad or during training. But with the Soviets revealing so little details of their space disasters at the time, perhaps until the Russians open their files, it will be many years before we know the full extent of their casualties during the 'space race'.

apollo 1


Apollo I capsule showing fire damageOf course, the US had its fair share of accidents too. Most notably, on January 27th, 1967, when a fire killed Apollo I crew members Lt. Col. Virgil 'Gus' Grissom, (the second American to fly into space) Lt. Col. Edward H. White II, (the first American to "walk" in space) and Lt. Cdr. Roger B. Chaffee, (a "rookie" on his first space mission). A sudden fire broke out in the command module during a launch pad test in which all three of the primary crew perished.

While strapped into their seats inside the Command Module atop the giant Saturn V Moon rocket, a faulty electrical switch created a spark somewhere beneath the seat of commander Gus Grissom. The wire, alive with electrical power, lay bare in a thick soup of 100 percent oxygen – one of the most dangerous and corrosive gases known. Exposed to an ignition source, it is extremely flammable.

The speed and intensity of the fire quickly exhausted the oxygen supply inside the crew cabin. Unable to deploy the hatch due to its cumbersome design and lack of breathable oxygen, the crew lost consciousness and perished.

An 18-month investigation showed NASA’s biggest mistake was locking the crew inside the spacecraft and pumping oxygen into it. NASA decided to then redesign the hatch, use a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen instead of pure oxygen, and use flame-retardant materials and a new emergency procedure at the pad. 

Virgil 'Gus' Grissom
'Gus' Grissom was concerned about the capability of the Apollo I


'Gus' Grissom was already a space veteran by the time he had joined the Apollo I project and was no stranger to NASA mishaps. In 1961, Grissom made the second American sub orbital space flight aboard the Mercury-Redstone 4, which was popularly known as the Liberty Bell 7.

After splashdown, explosive bolts blew the hatch off unexpectedly and water flooded into the tiny capsule. Grissom exited through the open hatch and into the ocean but nearly drowned as water filled his flight suit while a helicopter tried to lift and recover the spacecraft. However, the capsule sank because it had filled up with water.

Grissom strongly denied rumors that he had blown the hatch and NASA officials eventually concluded that he was correct. Initiating the explosive egress system required hitting a metal trigger with the side of a closed fist. This would always leave a large, obvious bruise on the Astronaut's forearm, but Grissom was found to not have any of the tell-tale bruising associated with triggering the emergency hatch release. The capsule was recovered in 1999 but no evidence was found which could conclusively explain how the explosive hatch release fired on its own.

In early 1964, fellow NASA astronaut Alan Shepard was grounded after being diagnosed with Ménière's disease and Grissom was designated command pilot for Gemini 3, the first manned Project Gemini flight. This mission made Grissom the first astronaut to fly twice beyond the accepted boundary of space.

Grissom soon became very frustrated with the Apollo I project and openly criticized NASA's sloppiness on more than one occasion. Grissom's troubles were recorded in an interview in late 1966 when he spoke to Jay Barbree, a veteran space reporter. Barbree met Grissom at a club in Cocoa Beach, Florida, and was surprised by what Grissom had to say. It wasn't long before Grissom was telling Barbree “Apollo is a piece of crap - it may never fly. We have problems and they’re not getting solved. It’s nothing like Mercury and Gemini and working with the Mac folks in St. Louis.”

According to Grissom, it was pressure from the White House that pushed the project forward ahead of time. He believed that President Lyndon Johnson would like to see NASA land on the moon before the polls opened in 1968. It would also help take the publics mind off the Vietnam conflict. “Johnson gave Apollo to his buddies instead of the guys with the experience and now he’s damn well wanting miracles that ain’t there. They’re rushing production and we need time, Jay, we need time” exclaimed Grissom.

Grissom also told the press "We've had problems before, but these have been coming in bushelfuls. Frankly, I think this mission has a pretty damn slim chance of flying its full fourteen days." The simulator that was used by the Apollo I team was outdated because the Apollo capsule had received 150 to 200 modifications. This made the simulator a poor tool for training because it was not identical to the actual Apollo I. Before the Apollo I capsule was finally placed atop the Saturn rocket at Cape Kennedy in January 1967, no less than 623 changes had been made to the vehicle since it was delivered in the previous August.

On January 22nd, 1967, Grissom picked a lemon from a tree in his backyard and placed it inside the window of the Apollo I simulator. It was his way of saying that he was uncomfortable with the constant hiccups that were happening.

Apollo I fire
The Apollo I fire

On the morning of the tragedy, the three Apollo I astronauts made their final ascent to the doomed capsule. Once again there were additional holdups and delays, such as high oxygen flow levels, a sour smell coming from Grissom's oxygen supply and faulty communications between the astronauts and the control room. Grissom asked the control room, "How can we get a man to the moon when we can't even talk between two buildings? " He even encouraged Deke Slayton, the former Mercury 7 astronaut, to get into the capsule to see for himself how bad the problems were.

After a short break, the tests resumed at 6.31 pm. It wasn't long before one of the astronauts calmly announced, "Fire, I smell fire." Two seconds after that, Edward White urgently shouted "Fire in the cockpit!" Emergency procedures for escape from the capsule required at least 90 seconds, although the crew had never been able to perform them in the minimum amount of time during training. The last inaudible radio communication from the capsule came just 18 seconds later, and an explosion happened just 35 seconds after the first report of fire.

The heat was so intense that engineers could not open the hatch from the outside for 6 minutes.


Did NASA decide that Grissom was too outspoken? Was Grissom silenced because he was publicly speaking out against NASA? Grissom claimed that the mission was 10 years away from reaching the Moon, and not just 2 years as was expected. Why would NASA put astronauts into a capsule without fire extinguishers and with stripped electrical wiring? And why would NASA put their astronauts into a capsule that had dangerously high pressured pure oxygen levels (16 psi) when they already knew such levels were hazardous from previous oxygen fires?

________________________________________________


Just two months before the Apollo I tragedy, Thomas Ronald Baron, a quality control inspector at Kennedy Space Centre, made a report based on his observations, and the gossip and rumor that he had collected from his fellow employees. He noted difficulties with persons, parts, equipment and procedures. The following report, written by Baron, highlights the poor workmanship and many problems with cleanliness and safety rules.

AN APOLLO REPORT

BY THOMAS RONALD BARON


September 1965-November 1966

It has often been said that "People must do what they think is right." In many cases this has been a costly quotation to follow, but it is probably one of the very few ways we have of advancing ourselves as a nation. There are too many opportunities for organizations to live off of the taxpayer. It always seems that the more tax moneys that can be had, the more this money is wasted. There is no question in my mind that there is gross mismanagement in relation to man-hours and proper control of materials, and to the treatment of people. In my opinion, North American Aviation has had the funds to correctly administer a Space Program without compromising the safety of its employees, the astronauts, or the objectives of the Project itself.

North American Aviation, has not, in many ways, met their contractual obligations to the United States Government or the taxpayer. I do not have all the information I need to prove all that is in this report. I just hope someone with the proper authority will use this information as a basis to conduct a proper investigation. Someone had to make known to the public and the government what infractions are taking place. I am attempting to do that, someone else will have to try to correct the infractions.

There are many reasons why this report is being written. I have been with NAA for the past sixteen months. During that time I took the time to make notes on daily happenings. There were difficulties with people, parts, equipment, and procedures, not to mention, poor safety practices and the accidents they caused. These notes, which were sometimes in the form of letters, were sent up to channels, starting with the leadman. In most cases, as far as I can remember, they were not acted upon or never got further than the leadman.

When I was hired by NAA, I was assigned to the Quality Control Department. I was told of the vast importance of my task, and of the great responsibility associated with it. I was told how the slightest infraction could be detrimental to the objectives of the program. I, along with others, was told how important our job was when it came to manned launches. We were told to report every infraction, no matter how minor we felt it was. Unfortunately, this is not practiced by the Company.

The Apollo program is only the beginning, but this is not to be used as an excuse for poor operations. I was just recently told by management that we were still in research and development even if we are going manned. I go along with this for the most part, but we should not compromise the safety of the astronauts just for the benefit of a schedule.

Trying to keep this Project on schedule has caused a great many problems in itself. It can also be said, that because of this objective in mind, it has actually cost us much time, thereby, putting us behind schedule.

Trying to keep this schedule has cost the taxpayer a great deal of money. Money wasted due to the tremendous waste of man-hours, materials, parts, and equipment. The proof of the waste is not too difficult to verify. It would take an investigation of procedures and interviewing several conscientious people. I am not talking about interviewing full supervisors or managers. I'm saying; interview the technicians, the mechanics, the QC man in the area of work. These are the people who know what is really going on as far as wasted man-hours and material, is concerned.

GENERAL NOTES
The incidents that are described in this report can be put into several categories. I have listed these categories for the benefit and clarification of the reader.
It must be noted that all of these problems were given to my supervisors at the time they took place or shortly thereafter. Many of the problems could and should have been eliminated or prevented if NAA took the proper steps to do so. Almost every case of trouble gave a clear warning as to what was going to happen. This is why I say, that if the leadman, or assistant supervisor took the proper action the problem for the most part, could have been avoided.

  • Lack of coordination between people in responsible positions.
  • Lack of communication between almost everyone.
  • The fact that people in responsible positions did not take many of the problems seriously.
  • Engineers operating equipment instead of technical people.
  • Many technicians do not know their job. This is partly due to the fact that they are constantly shifted from one job to another.
  • People are lax when it comes to safety.
  • People are lax when it comes to maintaining cleanliness levels.
  • We do not make a large enough effort to enforce the PQCP.
  • People do not get an official tie-in time period.
  • We do not maintain proper work and systems records.
  • NAA does not give the working force a feeling of accomplishment.
  • There is not one procedure that I can remember that was completed without a deviation, either written or oral.
  • Allowing ill practices to continue when the Company is aware of them.
  • The constant transfer of QC and technical types of people to different types of tasks. Many of the techs will tell the QC man that they have never done that type of job before, or used that type of equipment before. This is one of the most prevalent problems NAA has.

The following is a list of policies that NAA should follow to make themselves the "professional" people they should be in the first place. I am afraid the public had the wrong image in their minds when they think of project Apollo. They probably believe that everyone knows exactly what they are doing at all times. They probably also believe that the work out here at the launch complexes is done on a routine manner. They are wrong. I have been told by two managers that we are still in research and development stages even if we are going to send up a manned spacecraft. This, I firmly believe is the wrong approach to the project. Does NASA know or realize that every spec that we have is inadequate for the task being done? Do they really know that they are changed constantly to comply with the output of quality of the part or system being tested? Are they fully aware of the compromising position that NAA has put the program in? Do they know that of the great number of people we have working on the hardware are not satisfied with their own work and the work of others? NASA is not aware of the vast snags that go on in receiving inspection. Do they really know where all the parts and materials come from? I believe that all these questions can be answered with the word "No." 

  1. If an OCP has been written for a specific system, it should not be changed. Process specifications should not be changed to conform to the results of a test on a component.

  2. Men should be assigned to a specific task or area and stay there. In this way his chances of promotion increase. Too many people get "transferred" just before they get used to a system or work area. If they stayed where they were we would really be building a "professional" group of engineers, technicians and mechanics. As it stands now, we have very few.

  3. Our supervisors or anyone else that writes Internal Letters should coordinate with the people that will be affected by the letter. In most cases this does not appear to be done.

  4. We should completely eliminate all verbal orders.

  5. All launch people, troubleshooting people, systems engineers should work much more closely with NASA. I believe if we had more NASA people to see if the contractor is meeting their contractual obligations many problems could be eliminated. I would think that a project of this magnitude, would warrant this surveillance.

  6. A safety group that would take care of safety infractions immediately.

  7. Schedule shifts so they give a man a firm tie-in time that they get paid for.

  8. Immediately investigate improper practices and don't sluff them off.

  9. Solve the vast problem of communications between all the people.

  10. Many of the problems that are written about, have to do with the morale of the working people. There has been, at different times, a great deal of apathy on the part of these people. Much of this is caused by poor working conditions that are prevalent in some areas. At Pad 34 the bathroom facilities are extremely poor. There doesn't seem to be enough trailers available for the working personnel. The technicians at one time had all their tool boxes, extra clothing, etc. in a small semi truck trailer. The technicians also stayed in this trailer. They had no other place to go. Many times we had to be exposed to the elements for extended periods of time. There were no people to relieve us or no one scheduled a relief. People have missed lunches due to this problem. The laxity of the Company to protect the men by enforcing the safety policies, was another worry of the men. I remember a man that refused to go into an escape operation, because he did not feel safe. He had to report to the assistant QC manager.

  11. The constant transfers of men from one task to another, even if they are in the middle of a test, is distracting to the technicians. He never really knows if the test was completed properly or if some problems arose that he could have helped with because he was familiar with the original set-up. He is left without any feeling of accomplishment for the task he started. NAA does not realize that this feeling is important to a good technician or mechanic.

Baron passed on these and other criticisms to his superiors and friends; then he deliberately let his findings leak out to newsmen. North American considered his actions irresponsible and discharged him on 5 January 1967. The company then analyzed and refuted each of Baron's charges and allegations. In the rebuttal, North American denied anything but partial validity to Baron's wide-ranging accusations, although some company officials later testified before Congress that about half of the charges were well-grounded. When the Apollo I tragedy occurred, Baron was apparently in the process of expanding his 55-page paper into a 500-page report.

When his indictments were finally aired before Teague's subcommittee, during a meeting at the Cape on 21st of April, 1967, Baron's credibility was impaired by one of his alleged informants, a fellow North American employee named Mervin Holmburg. Holmburg denied knowing anything about the cause of the accident, although Baron had told the committee that Holmburg "knew exactly what caused the fire." Holmburg testified that Baron "gets all his information from anonymous phone calls, people calling him and people dropping him a word here and there. That is what he tells me."

Ironically, Baron and all his family died in a car-train crash only a week after this exposure to congressional questioning!

________________________________________________


An Interesting Speech At The 40th Anniversary Lectures

During the John Glenn Lecture at the recent 40th Anniversary of Apollo Celebrations, Chris Kraft, the former Johnson Space Center Director, said: ‘This was a whole new concept to these people. Many of these people had no experience in space flight. They came from all other kinds of engineering walks of life. But they had been given the task to very quickly come up to speed and start building a space craft. And quite frankly, they built a damned lousy space craft! They were running like the Devil, trying to get it done. They didn’t have time to listen to lessons learned, and it was quite a turmoil in 1967 when we sent 3 men to their death on a pad at Cape Canaveral. It was a terrible day, a very terrible day to watch that happen.’

‘And we had a NASA Committee that looked at what was wrong, and everything was wrong. There was poor workmanship, poor wiring, poor redundancy concepts, etc. And so we had a regrouping of NASA following Mr. Thompson’s review of that program, and one of the first meetings we had with George Lowe as the new program manager was a meeting to decide what we needed to do. And we listed 125 things that had to be done to make that space craft viable.’ ‘We had to rebuild the industry, had to rebuild ourselves, and we had to rebuild the space craft. In the summer of 1968, after recognizing that we were ready to fly the space craft, we flew Apollo 7 and Apollo 8. And also, I want to say that although the death of those three men is a terrible thing in our memory – without the fire, I guarantee you that we would still be trying to get to the Moon, because that was not going to happen with the hardware we had.’

If you take into consideration the damning words of Chris Kraft and the Baron Report, how exactly did NASA manage to launch man towards the Moon just 2 and a half years after the Apollo I tragedy?

 
Part II coming soon

Home

 

 




 

Copyright 1999-2010 © Cosmic Conspiracies. All rights reserved. The above data may only be used with permission.